Guide
Key Word Search
Multi-Field Search
Browse
Met Opera on Demand
Sirius and XM
Repertory Report
Performers Report
Contacts
Met Opera Website
Boris Godunov
Brooklyn Academy of Music, New York, Brooklyn, Sat, November 29, 1924
In Italian
Boris Godunov (69)
Modest Mussorgsky | Modest Mussorgsky
- Boris Godunov
- Fyodor Chaliapin
- Prince Shuisky
- Giordano Paltrinieri
- Pimen
- Jos? Mardones
- Grigory
- Armand Tokatyan
- Marina
- Ina Bourskaya
- Varlaam
- Giovanni Martino
- Simpleton
- Max Bloch
- Nikitich
- Louis D'Angelo
- Shchelkalov
- Lawrence Tibbett
- Innkeeper
- Henriette Wakefield
- Missail
- Max Altglass
- Xenia
- Grace Anthony
- Feodor
- Raymonde Delaunois
- Nurse
- Merle Alcock
- Khrushchov
- unknown
- Lavitsky
- Carl Schlegel
- Chernikovsky
- James Wolfe
- Conductor
- Gennaro Papi
Orchestration by Nicolai Rimsky-Korsakov
Translation by M.Delines, E. Palermi, G. Pardo
Synopsis of Scenes
Act I, Scene 1: The wall of Novodievitchi Convent, in the Great Environs of Moscow
Act I, Scene 2: A cell in the Convent of Miracles
Act I, Scene 3: The square between the two Cathedrals of the Assumption and of the Archangels
Act II, Scene 1: An inn on the frontier of Lithuania
Act II, Scene 2: Apartments of the Czar in the Kremlin at Moscow
Act II, Scene 3: Garden of the Castle of Michek
Act III, Scene 1: The forest of Kromy
Act III, Scene 2: Hall of the Duma in the Kremlin
Chaliapin always sang Boris in Russian.
Review 1:
Review of Edward Cushing in the Brooklyn Eagle
BORIS GODUNOV WITH CHALIAPIN AT THE ACADEMY
Russian Basso Makes First Brooklyn Appearance in Moussorgsky's Opera
Feodor Chaliapin, so far as we can discover, has never sung in Brooklyn. Memory does not serve to recall any posters on the Academy boards heralding his appearance, except for the recent concert which he did not give, But as an operatic actor he was entirely unfamiliar to the boards of the Brooklyn house until last evening when he appeared in the title role of Moussorgsky's "Boris Godunov."
The Academy has its advantages over the Manhattan Opera - its somewhat smaller dimensions bring one into closer contact with the stage which, if unhappy in the case of last week's "Lohengrin," is, nevertheless, distinctly favorable to the finer production and performance of "Boris." The infinite nuance of Chaliapin's performance can be followed with ease, no telling detail need escape any member of the audience - and perhaps, if we may be permitted a glance into the future, a Brooklyn "P?lleas et M?llisande" would be infinitely more satisfying than any possible in the larger Metropolitan.
Doubtless a large proportion of last evening's audience was familiar with Chaliapin's interpretation of what is rightly considered his finest role. His Boris has achieved a fame too wide easily to overlook, for it is perhaps the finest operatic characterization - quite probably one of the finest operatic characterizations - to be found on the stage. Its essential greatness is a little difficult to analyze or describe, for it is a matter of emotional rather than of intellectual perception. Chaliapin does not amaze us by his mastery of dramatic technique. His methods are extremely simple, and their effect is upon our sensibility and not upon our intellect. It is a carefully wrought performance in which the endless and exacting detail is submerged in completeness of the whole - is it a performance in which intuition blended with intelligence results in a portrait of unforgettable reality.
How Chaliapin Uses His Hands
There is certain majesty and no little art to the manner in which Chaliapin uses his hands. The continuous play of gesture which he employs might be ludicrous in another, but in him it has a rightness that cannot be questioned. The Russians are a sensitive race - they are far more emotionally analytical than we, and they have in consequence a ready capacity for revealing their passions, their distress. To understand completely a performance such as given by Chaliapin in "Boris" it is necessary that one realize the distinction between the Russian temperament and that of Western Europe or America.
Much the same applies to Moussorgsky's opera. It is nationalistic - both simple and profound. In passages such as the song of the Idiot, inadequately done last evening by Max Bloch, it has a distinctly Slavic na?vet?, and in passages such as Boris's monologue before the entrance of Shuisky, it has a certain vastness, barbaric nobility typical of a certain Russian culture.
Garden Scene Unimpressive
The garden scene, brought in for the sole purpose of supplying the fragmentary work with a love duet and an adequate female role, might be omitted without damage to the whole - it is unimpressive, and in it Moussorgsky makes one of his rare descents to mere pretty lyricism. Ina Bourskaya was the Marina of this scene, singing the music with less enthusiasm and beauty than it, inadequate page though it is, deserves.
Armand Tokatyan was the evening's Dimitri - a Hue-voiced pretender to the Czar's throne. Raymonde Delaunois contributed an excellent performance of the Teodore, sympathetic, boy-like. Mardones sang his air of Kazan with ribald esprit - it is a rousing Tartaric brindisi. Giordano Paltrinieri sang Shuisky and the balance of the large cast included Grace Anthony, Merle Alcock, Carl Schlegl, Lawrence Tibbett, Giovanni Martino, Max Altglass, Henrietta Wakefield, Louis d'Angelo and James Wolf. The conductor was Gennaro Papi.
Search by season: 1924-25
Search by title: Boris Godunov,
Met careers
- Gennaro Papi [Conductor]
- Fyodor Chaliapin [Boris Godunov]
- Giordano Paltrinieri [Prince Shuisky]
- Jos? Mardones [Pimen]
- Armand Tokatyan [Grigory]
- Ina Bourskaya [Marina]
- Giovanni Martino [Varlaam]
- Max Bloch [Simpleton]
- Louis D'Angelo [Nikitich]
- Lawrence Tibbett [Shchelkalov]
- Henriette Wakefield [Innkeeper]
- Max Altglass [Missail]
- Grace Anthony [Xenia]
- Raymonde Delaunois [Feodor]
- Merle Alcock [Nurse]
- unknown [Khrushchov]
- Carl Schlegel [Lavitsky]
- James Wolfe [Chernikovsky]